RSS feed for comments on this post.
TrackBack URI
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
Birthing your baby.
Childbirth shouldn’t hurt as much as it does. Women who are lucky enough to be undisturbed during labour naturally shut off the part of their brain which deals with conscious thought and which also registers pain. If this is allowed to happen, the massive cramps that the uterus makes still hurt, but you don’t care about it - it doesn’t bother you as much. You’re high and spaced out.
In our culture we don’t leave labouring women alone - we talk to them; make them labour in brightly lit rooms; interrupt their labour to examine them or move them into hospital. Every time a labouring woman is spoken to, she has to re-awaken her conscious brain to respond and it starts hurting again. She gets frightened which interrupts her normal hormonal cascade and makes it hurt more and take longer. The longer it takes and the more anxious the mother is, the more dangerous birth becomes. This makes it more likely the mother will need medical intervention…and so on and so forth.
If we just left labouring women well alone and let them tell us when something wasn’t right (which they’d know because they would be listening to their instincts) way more babies would be born naturally and way less women would find labour as painful as most western women find it. That’s why IMO women who have ‘natural’ births are seen as such martyrs - it really, really hurts if you do natural (ie. medication-free) birthing and your conscious brain is switched on. If you’re in that much pain, you get frightened. It’s a very unpleasant experience and not nearly as positive as natural birth is purported to be.
Those women who have good natural birth experiences were probably lucky enough to be enabled to get to ‘labourland’ - to switch their subconscious brain off. This is why freebirthing is becoming more popular (birthing without a midwife in attendance) - you don’t get disturbed. I’d be scared of freebirthing because sometimes things do go wrong and you need someone who knows what they’re doing. The ideal would be to have a traditional midwife - someone who just sits on their hands in the next room and only helps when asked to.
This is why I (who has had one birth with no pain relief whatsoever - a purely ‘natural’ birth) would recommend to a mother hoping for a natural birth with the presence of a midwife to consider using entonox if they are finding it difficult to switch off her conscious brain. Some mothers will be able to get there themselves but if you can’t, labour is such agony. If gas and air helps you space out, then go for it - you’ll end up less frightened, less ‘pushy’ and hopefully with a birth much closer to what it’s meant to be like naturally.
RSS feed for comments on this post.
TrackBack URI
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
Would love to completely agree with you, but for my last (home) birth I’d followed an intense hypnobirthing study course and was able to completely relax during contractions. The midwife sat in the next room and didn’t interfere. It was still B****y agony!! Don’t know why - in theory I do believe it shouldn’t have been, but it was. Though that doesn’t alter the fact that I agree with your conclusions about what birth should be like.
Comment by Joanna • @ October 9, 2007 @ 7:30 pm
I don’t think it’s as agony as it is when you’re ‘fully’ conscious, though IYSWIM. Actually, it is as agony, but it bothers you less (although ‘bother’ is rather an understatement - maybe ‘terrifies’ would be better!).
Comment by
Clare • @ October 9, 2007 @ 10:42 pm
Completely agree. The reason I am freebirthing this time (apart from the initial impetus, which was having no freaking choices on the spectrum between freebirth and the full machines-that-go-ping hospital delivery experience *grr*), is that I’ve had the experience in both my previous births of reaching that labourland high, and being yanked out of it by care providers. In my last, birth centre birth, I hit transition floating on a pink rosy orgasmic high of endorphins, and plummeted out of it just before a two+ hour second stage with a posterior baby when my midwife did a VE and told me I had a cervical lip, then decided to break my waters. After that - which is probably the absolute best I could expect in “the system” - I’d rather take my chances with the tiny risk of something going wrong *naturally* rather than *iatrogenically*, and given that I’m five minutes drive away from a hospital, I think it’s a reasonable trade-off in terms of safety. I’m also being a hell of a lot more proactive in my pregnancy with diet, posture, research and alternative therapies this time!
Comment by Liz in Australia • @ October 10, 2007 @ 1:28 am
You’ve got a missing not in paragraph 3…
And I wouldn’t be advocating Entonox with such glee myself. My hallucinations totally freaked out my companions in the labour room, and weren’t terrifically pleasant to experience either.
I agree about leaving women to labour alone. Independent midwives for me next time, if there is a next time, with hands-off instructions.
Comment by Emma • @ October 10, 2007 @ 2:55 pm
It was with an independent midwife that I had my most negative birth
She wanted me to *not* get spaced out!
I think the good thing about entonox is you can try it, then stop using it if you don’t get on with it. Far better to get to labourland naturally, really, though!
Comment by
Clare • @ October 10, 2007 @ 6:18 pm